Medium claw-oriented shell or smaller low-mass alternative?. Compare documented specifications, shell fit and ownership tradeoffs without an absolute winner.
Last Updated: 10/4/2026 · Research-based editorial comparison
Key Differences
X2v3 Medium records 120.4 × 63 × 38 mm and 52 g, while the existing MAYA 8K is a smaller low-mass alternative with a 45 g official figure. These are exact catalog versions, not Mini/ES or MAYA X. Unknown battery and control details remain unknown.
Shape & Size
Compare the exact dimensions in the table with a mouse you already know. Width and height do not determine comfort by themselves; the grip and hand-size research below explains the contact differences.
Weight, Sensor & Polling
The table preserves unknown fields and manufacturer reporting limits. Weight conventions, firmware and optional receivers can differ. Neither a larger DPI maximum nor a higher polling ceiling establishes lower measured latency or better aim.
Choose X2v3 Medium If…
Choose this model if you prefer the Medium X2v3’s dimensions and claw-oriented research context. The box’s receiver supports 1K; its documented 8K maximum requires a separately sold dongle.
Choose MAYA 8K If…
Choose this model if the smaller MAYA 8K shell and recorded 45 g figure suit your required contact points. Verify the exact receiver package and current product-page conditions instead of assuming every MAYA bundle is identical.
Price Positioning
No live selling price or value winner is established here. Historical MSRP, when verified, is labelled separately in the table. Compare current new-product checkout costs, optional receivers and shipping before deciding; merchant links and commissions do not affect these conclusions.
Pulsar describes the wide-waist, low-hump shell as claw/fingertip oriented. That remains manufacturer guidance rather than a PeriphPick hands-on finding.
Hand Size
Official medium-shell dimensions are available, but exact-model independent hand-size analysis was not confirmed. No numeric compatibility ratings are assigned.
Gaming Use
Low-mass competitive input is the official focus. Windows macros can support secondary commands, while the documented shell is not a dedicated MMO button grid.
Connection & Battery Conditions
Receiver-based wireless is confirmed. Standard reporting is 1K; optional 8K needs a compatible separate receiver. Battery conditions and unverified wired/Bluetooth details remain unstated.
ProSettings favours claw and fingertip and cautions against a filled-palm expectation. This is qualitative external evidence, not a precise grip score.
Hand Size
Fnatic positions MAYA 8K toward smaller hands; the actual ProSettings review emphasizes compact contact. Exact axis fields stay empty rather than supplying converted unlabelled measurements.
Gaming Use
Competitive aiming with keyboard-based abilities is the relevant focus. Optical controls and reporting capability do not establish game-specific superiority.
Connection & Battery Conditions
Official wired and wireless modes use USB-C and the included Fnatic 8K receiver. Runtime is up to 80 hours at 1K or 20 at 8K; retained wired reporting is 1K.
Dimensions, weight, sensor names and maximum specifications describe products. They do not establish an overall winner. Hand and grip assessments need research context. No hands-on testing is implied.
Affiliate commissions and buying-channel priorities are excluded from this comparison.
X2v3 Medium
Available merchants · channel order does not determine comparison conclusions.
